Top Clinton aide Huma Abedin edited radical Muslim website for more than 12 years. The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is a fundamental Islamist site with extensive connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Huma worked for Hillary Clinton the entire time she edited this Islamic publication.
Abedin has had continuous access to the highest offices of government since she began working for Mrs. Clinton in 1996 and will likely become White House chief of staff if Clinton is elected. Did Hillary Clinton approve of the work Abedin did for the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs and just hide it from us or did Clinton not know Abedin worked for the radical Muslim website?
Radical Muslim Website Incompatible With Core American Values
The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs website publishes content on a range of subjects, all of it consistent with radical Islamist doctrine. Thus, it is all incompatible with core American beliefs. It only takes a brief snippet to understand that the writings and the philosophies they endorse are unacceptable to Americans.
The website energetically opposes basic women’s rights. The website condones, at least tacitly, the Muslim rape culture which has been exposed by the European immigration crisis, with a great deal of language that seems to endorse as well. Also endorsed is the barbaric practice of female genital mutilation. The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs website also blames the United States for September 11 Islamic terrorist attacks.
Abedin’s Radical Islamic Activities Covered Up
There have been whispers over the years about Huma Abedin’s involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood, but nothing was disclosed publicly. Now we know that Huma’s radical Islamic activities were kept from the American people because they have been covered up by Hillary Clinton.
Discovering that Clinton and Abedin have covered-up information about her radical Islamic history for more than a decade makes the story truly remarkable. There is no justification for withholding Abedin’s Islamist history. Americans have a right to know that someone with access to the highest levels of government has core beliefs that are incompatible with our own.
Clinton Achievement On Women’s Rights Challenged By Abedin
Hillary’s work to support the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, is one of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments. Her campaign website tells us as much. The speech Hillary delivered at that time famously declaring that “Women’s rights are human rights,” is now a focal point of her campaign.
Abedin published an article at the same time that dismantled Clinton’s historic position. Entitled “Women’s Rights are Islamic Rights,” the 1996 article argues that single mothers, working mothers, and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. The article also condemned the revealing clothing that was ushered in by women’s liberation.
In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote complaining that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women.
Clinton Feminist Agenda Diametrically Opposed To Abedin Islamic Position
Conversely, “by placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.”
She seemed to rationalize domestic abuse as a result of “the stress and frustrations that men encounter in their daily lives.” While denouncing such violence, she didn’t think it did much good to punish men for it. She added in her 31-page treatise: “More men are victims of domestic violence than women. If we see the world through ‘men’s eyes’ we will find them suffering from many hardships and injustices.”
“The spiral of violence having continued unabated worldwide, and widely seen to be allowed to continue, was building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker that was kept on a vigorous flame while the lid was weighted down with various kinds of injustices and sanctions . . . It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve.”
Knowledge Of Abedin’s Radical Islamic History
Huma Abedin is Clinton’s longest-serving and, by all accounts, most loyal aide. The devout, Saudi-raised Muslim started working for her in the White House, then followed her to the Senate and later the State Department. She’s now helping run Clinton’s presidential campaign as vice chair and may end up back in the White House. The contradictions are hard to reconcile. The campaign is not talking, despite repeated requests for interviews.
But that’s hard to believe. Her closest adviser served as an editor for that same Saudi propaganda organ for a dozen years. The same one that in 1999 published a book, edited by her mother, that justifies the barbaric practice of female genital mutilation under Islamic law, while claiming “man-made laws have in fact enslaved women.”
Clinton Will Extract Price For Being Humiliated
And in 2010, Huma arranged for then-Secretary of State Clinton to speak alongside Abedin’s hijab-wearing mother at an all-girls college in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. According to a transcript of the speech, Clinton said Americans have to do a better job of getting past “the stereotypes and the mischaracterizations” of the oppressed Saudi woman. She also assured the audience of burqa-clad girls that not all American girls go “around in a bikini bathing suit.”
At no point in her long visit there, which included a question-and-answer session, did this so-called champion of women’s rights protest the human-rights violations Saudi women suffer under the Shariah laws that Abedin’s mother actively promotes? Nothing about the laws barring women from driving or traveling anywhere without male “guardians.”
If fighting for women’s rights is one of Clinton’s greatest achievements, why has she retained as her closest adviser a woman who gave voice to harsh Islamist critiques of her Beijing platform?